Analyzing exit clauses
I'm considering whether a "performance-related exit clause" might not activate. Most of these clauses tend to favor the club rather than the player, but without the article, I can't be sure.
I want to give a balanced view: for Juve, an injury is detrimental sportingly, but if he cannot leave on a Bosman deal, financially, it might not matter until 2026. However, an injury could lower the transfer fee and affect summer sales. It could also limit leverage from his camp for a raise or exit. I should ask for the source link to analyze, and plan to keep my final answer concise in a bullet list format.
你是想让我解读这条新闻、还是找原文来源/要点总结？
先给你几个关键信息与判断：
- “DV9”一般指尤文的弗拉霍维奇。按公开信息，他与尤文的合同到2026年，不存在2025年“自由身离队”的常规路径，除非有特殊条款或出现拖欠工资等“正当理由”解约情况（FIFA 14 bis），否则谈不上明夏自由走人。
- 这类“意媒”标题多半是在说：受伤会影响潜在买家的兴趣与球员话语权，从而减弱他与尤文在续约/转会上的博弈力度；对尤文来说，短期竞技上是坏事，但在合同与市场层面可能“未必是坏事”。
- 对尤文的实际影响：短期战力下滑；若夏窗原本计划高价出售，伤情可能压价；但球员阵营若想逼走或要高薪续约，受伤会削弱筹码。若伤停较长，保险通常会覆盖部分薪资。 
- “明夏自由离队”的说法存疑。若你有原报道链接，我可以帮你核对条款、来源可信度和具体逻辑。
要不要把链接贴来？我可以给你一个更准确的要点拆解和影响评估。